Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Again this is a legal requirement. If the cost of allowing this means Apple is going to tank then maybe it should tank.


So, if a company can't afford to enable "nast[iness]", they "should tank"? I am trying to take everyone's argument at face value, but yours doesn't make a lot of sense to me.


The company should not prevent people discussing labor rights or labor organization. It's as simple as that.


I think you’re ignoring the preceding comments in the thread.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: