Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> this feels like a theoretical concern as of yet.

This was Ajit Pai's argument. That we should regulate nothing until there's a problem. There are two problems with it,

(1) It's already a problem. There have been documented examples of ISPs throttling, favoring their own partnered content. Also they are actively expanding or seeking to expand zero rating which is anti-competitive.

(2) At the point you actually have a barren landscape in which competitors cannot grow, you've already sucked in a slew of investors on the idea that these monopolies' business models are sound. If the government steps in at that point, they risk being seen as the bad guy for destroying all that investment, which can have political consequences.

We can avoid all that by acknowledging the existing problems, and encouraging competition among ISPs. There should be very few people advocating for monopolies, and we outnumber them.

> Prioritizing non-streaming-service (e.g. throttling Netflix at prime time) packets could, for example, help a regional ISP stay competitive.

That only helps Netflix and that ISP maintain their grip. It's only competitive if by competitive you mean stomping out any new ISP or content provider that is unable to make such agreements.



Check out https://broadbandnow.com/report/dig-once-digital-divide/ and read up about how PROW’s (public rights-of-ways) work.

It’s why even in Silicon Valley in 2022 we’re paying Comcast and can’t get Google or even Verizon FTTH.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: