Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Am I understanding what you're saying correctly?

* We need a deterministic input language

* The LLM generates machine code

Isn't that just a compiler? Why do we need the LLM at that point?



If the compiler only gets you 80% of the way there, but what it does is sufficient to put the LLM on rails, like programming language mad libs, I'd say that's a win.


Yup, that's the idea. Mad libs are still constrained


I feel like I'm still not understanding something. How does making the output from the LLM lower level help?


Concrete example: Next/Turborepo. These tools make your life easier if you drink some kool aid. Rather than have the agent scaffold the app you have the agent use a tool that scaffolds. Agents write specs to manage tools, and those tools scaffold the code, then the agents just sprinkle in business logic that is too bespoke for codegen.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: