Which fact would you like to dispute?

That the Geneva Conventions cover more than civilians is... not tough to back up. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciii-1949

And what is the relevance here? That's talking about prisoners of war, not talking about military use of "civilian" things.

Are POWs civilians?

Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."

Accurate, or not?

Technicalities. I was talking about what is protected from attack. Nobody's attacking POWs, it's irrelevant.

I'm just reminding you that you have no citations in your post. I don't wish to debate you.