Thanks, but I was specifically referring to the same voting ring that appeared to have put the article on the front page in the first place. I would hope the rest of the community would recognise a blogspam repost of a marketing puf-piece puff piece when they see one.
I found it interesting and I upvoted the article. So just because you don't like the company that the article is published by does not mean the article is a marketing puff piece.
